From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2311 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2004 00:49:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2283 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 00:49:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 00:49:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 30227 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 00:49:10 -0000 Received: from taltos.codesourcery.com (zack@66.92.218.83) by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 00:49:10 -0000 Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:49:10 -0700 To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, GDB Subject: Re: RFC: Add DWARF 2 support for section group References: <20040429003204.GA4634@lucon.org> From: Zack Weinberg Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040429003204.GA4634@lucon.org> (H. J. Lu's message of "Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:32:04 -0700") Message-ID: <87smen1ud5.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2 "H. J. Lu" writes: > The current ELF linker doesn't support DWARF for section group. [...] Barf. Why are we continuing to extend the .gnu.linkonce hack, when we should be using proper ELF comdat groups? zw