From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14963 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2013 21:04:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14939 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2013 21:04:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 21:04:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r99L4UI6020387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Oct 2013 17:04:30 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r99L4Sag025514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Oct 2013 17:04:29 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Binutils Development Cc: GDB Development Subject: Re: src.git test repository References: <87y565m7ma.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 21:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87y565m7ma.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2013 09:19:09 -0600") Message-ID: <87r4bu9mw3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> I've made a src.git test repository for testing. Please try it out. Tom> This repository has all the configuration bits in it that I expect to Tom> use in the final conversion -- email hooks, bugzilla hooks, etc. Please Tom> be aware of that if you make any changes. One note here is that I am still considering a hook to reject merge commits. The rationale for this is that merge commits are ugly, and that it isn't a big deal to require a rebase before a merge, so that any merge is a fast-forward. I think it isn't onerous to follow this rule for all branches -- there being plenty of options for git hosting where you can go nuts -- but of course I welcome your considered reasons to think otherwise. Tom> (I intend to test all these things live sometime this week. So far Tom> they've only been tested piecemeal on my machine.) I've done various test commits and pushes and I think these scripts are working adequately well. If you want to see the current format of the commit messages, look at one of the "cvs" mailing lists. E.g.: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-10/msg00062.html We can make changes to the format if desired. I tried to keep pretty much the same information that was in the old CVS commit message, though I didn't attempt to exactly mimic the format. Commits mentioning PRs also go to bugzilla. See my test PR for an example: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030 The format for bugzilla can differ from the format for the commit-list message, but I chose to keep them the same. Again, changeable. Tom