From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 6JBVIj+uyGPe7hkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:43:11 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8978A1E128; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:43:11 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=ZMKdhr4P; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 406941E110 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:43:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4C03858291 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 02:43:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9C4C03858291 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1674096189; bh=K7LvItuW9at0Cesv48GPXZQAZbwQVQfxAs17frKoNMg=; h=To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=ZMKdhr4PvRogRhW95ntcHVOatC+0KbMH+YTODMKKsTjbjAfd+drxNb2LifxBoSBu4 22X5qKenjBFJANGu8uL4W2f8SaSiCogTyABySD4RD5P5rPmEa09ZHaqyFA6GA/62CP ZvzNQkGQiRCS1p+6DXNSnlxvXPdP2eKzegN0/5YQ= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FCB73858D28 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 02:42:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5FCB73858D28 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-228-6eFIiXPLMsqoj5h7D4nJwg-1; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:42:37 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 6eFIiXPLMsqoj5h7D4nJwg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E54029AB3F7; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 02:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.56]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 457CD492B00; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 02:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=vm-rhel7) by redhat.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pIKst-0006ws-OI; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:42:36 -0500 To: Simon Marchi Cc: Jan Vrany , GDB mailing list Subject: Re: CI scripts References: Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:42:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Simon Marchi via Gdb's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:55:14 -0500") Message-ID: <87r0vrnt2b.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: "Frank Ch. Eigler via Gdb" Reply-To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Simon Marchi via Gdb writes: > [...] >> I'm wondering whether the CI scripts for your job are available? >> I'd like to setup a similar job on my CI to avoid similar problems >> in future. >> [...] > Yes, it's on Jenkins, the job description (it uses Jenkins Job Builder) > is here: > > https://github.com/simark/lttng-ci/blob/master/jobs/binutils-gdb.yaml > [...] > https://github.com/simark/lttng-ci/blob/master/scripts/binutils-gdb/build.sh (I assume y'all are also aware of https://builder.sourceware.org/, which runs several gdb build/test variants.) > It was green for a while (I filter out pre-existing known failures / > flaky tests in the testsuite, hoping to fix those little by little). [...] Yeah, that's an interesting problem. We're also addressing it within the bunsen testsuite data analysis gadget also running here on sourceware, but hopefully with no hard-coded "false-results" lists required. - FChE