From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-35088-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25918 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2009 16:18:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 25910 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2009 16:18:51 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qy0-f199.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f199.google.com) (209.85.221.199)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:18:44 +0000
Received: by qyk37 with SMTP id 37so1175777qyk.10         for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.2.71 with SMTP id 7mr778164qai.295.1248884322121;         Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.gmail.com (207-172-203-39.c3-0.upd-ubr7.trpr-upd.pa.cable.rcn.com [207.172.203.39])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm973936qwj.56.2009.07.29.09.18.41         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:18:00 -0000
Message-ID: <87ocr3qx7j.wl%naesten@gmail.com>
From: Samuel Bronson <naesten@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Private data members
In-Reply-To: <h4pjhu$vct$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <200907291245.32359.vladimir@codesourcery.com> 	<20090729133846.GA29761@caradoc.them.org> 	<h4pjhu$vct$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)  FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.3  (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00229.txt.bz2

At Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:41:20 +0400,
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> 
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > I don't think ignore_count_ is clear.
> 
> Well, it's a convention for naming private variables used by roughly
> half of C++ developers, so I expect many current and future contributors
> know it already.

Hmm. I'm only familiar with the _ignore_count convention that's used
in e.g. Python (and sometimes in C, even though it's not really
allowed in user code there).