From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30880 invoked by alias); 21 May 2013 18:31:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30844 invoked by uid 89); 21 May 2013 18:31:52 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 18:31:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4LIVl5v032682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 21 May 2013 14:31:48 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-72.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.72]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4LIVkFQ007432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 21 May 2013 14:31:47 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Kifa The Great Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Method call and calling convention References: <87y5b8jncx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 18:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87y5b8jncx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 21 May 2013 10:42:38 -0600") Message-ID: <87obc4jib1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Kifa> Could you please tell me if this is a bug, feature or maybe I do Kifa> something wrong? Tom> It looks like a bug to me. Kai pointed out that this wasn't totally clear. What I meant was that the gdb behavior seems to be a bug. Tom