From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id mwZ0E3HQkGf6RRcAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 06:03:13 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=MwDrepYE; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 404941E100; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 06:03:13 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30AD61E08E for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 06:03:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5223857706 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:03:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BF5223857706 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1737543791; bh=NFr4WsYPR/6oEmcY/Kxqfxq4JdsVGp/yOxmlxMLpFjg=; h=To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=MwDrepYEtGKtsx6BGT2SVjOKsni9kEyCTz+UPLGiv97WoKTSWxp0G55syQMw8tcu1 DNJYELfGcCZyrZiOym3FnkEiV1sITNYCOgPw9yxwt+4qeauIf1mGv0FxRCcRdEh8Oc TnY1hGiVpLseytBoDjOFkOVMl7SALsyvnfkd/sbk= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C0C3857C68 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:02:28 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C0C0C3857C68 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org C0C0C3857C68 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1737543748; cv=none; b=HRFL97JGLd3u2rhAk3I97jCGmTsrBCO/cyzUU49/OnqnYx9PjLaK9llBXN7KbWzrQXl+h4dBtxKsI3llPu6PbMGAnPqMrCYggruAs/AOtsuzvgLKUOwn7X3VF9wCUCrclRSZ/1vPm9Ky3iecZtuqs/3KFbRyhrJr9WG26CtKThI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1737543748; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1Sauwu5fuUm70eeP724YuAHhPmXR6n6nAiSsBubLJZw=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=VibLD4RsgBUCIjzlE9pko4DnKwEnLbzouUTT+l4VjEChykv284gm1QGoDBy4Y4VF4W1FVZxpCAFcms9MaJMOzhoTpSD43DkgeEaQj/IvKh+yGiCDCaGQpyOSzZsMXrcAPzB46iT83L2D6KBOa9Pgf9uf48ZzBre6lWHZIV5+seU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C0C0C3857C68 Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-29-oJm-J7gNMFCZR2h20T5zBg-1; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 06:02:27 -0500 X-MC-Unique: oJm-J7gNMFCZR2h20T5zBg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: oJm-J7gNMFCZR2h20T5zBg Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4361ac8b25fso36571195e9.2 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 03:02:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737543746; x=1738148546; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NFr4WsYPR/6oEmcY/Kxqfxq4JdsVGp/yOxmlxMLpFjg=; b=uG8hIQyKJ4yUFscZvEwBt5orypYCHfOynFG+rGDv+lmKwBg27o87dViiAfcaMOUjtB Sz7Mjm4D9qJnbkjpE35Gb/yEdmqTkTOVntdclflWGz8VyKdITCVB5sm3IagAFlmITNbx 8+VkzuyVSWL8Y6MzPk72ixPgCyIwZmAetSg4QbF76ZaDHxiu+1cbKM7R3+U4q+trdPuX 9TuMPCS39VwQxwDRLOUHbpanSOlrzXeuiZMByZV9WqhK1vl4gqJjAa0kvVkOvLft/kP7 sQtqgWbHbocxwvK4KCX8IlyRKFjJMD/Qz6Xr0M8tWd8Ooyum3h6RaNfYDy9nXLXePcrU O2mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyqJn1ax57ZkHJKcXRPbCLwY/1Ps+swLEfM5W4OejEu31hH111S uF6NG0y8W0DdgHnVW3d361kxdDJNVJml1y5PeurEMXeeSMmjB+C20LicE0By6H/sLARKHxNEWIW L6wtkjQU0sjVRzfONnOjn0All2XvwyoYvHYVMzhU57mJs6sMQ X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncumyLOm1WajiNRhATJz7cBF5T8/EFX80RulqPwXz/fdWiQEkWZgwOPPMOnYmk/ kJFhX8bbtS5XU/3PyLKEIfSI6kmdhtCwcsMFGDZnqf8nGq/apSiM/as2bzvthdAp9MtYYCPqVKE OW2ry8D4h2S5cX1Cu3vkF/974YhplCr3aFBLK+P14wUHUsXyedvIQJKWA8wGEajSaSePGOxZ2XR 8ZTIws0rnAxShbNEAIrVy/W9XGcq4w0zjsdIoAvvfKaqu78rzQpzTfO127KZRtqql9+oHmwcFNH vQi+P59KK8biEMjfKWM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1987:b0:436:faf1:9da with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-438913c68ebmr196206915e9.2.1737543746089; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 03:02:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEkax0Z925vi3ZzR54jIxTg3a8eNezC/IiJmXEydCa+jGRKQq/PmLyZkq573YeS4lnUjBtvtA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1987:b0:436:faf1:9da with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-438913c68ebmr196206575e9.2.1737543745741; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 03:02:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (44.226.159.143.dyn.plus.net. [143.159.226.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38bf3214fc9sm15616968f8f.6.2025.01.22.03.02.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 Jan 2025 03:02:25 -0800 (PST) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 16.1 released! In-Reply-To: References: <87tt9smftq.fsf@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:02:24 +0000 Message-ID: <87o6zzm7r3.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: Wm_GWBl33baXT5qJShUVLUh0z5Ndl0-zEgF9C7cJCGU_1737543746 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andrew Burgess via Gdb Reply-To: Andrew Burgess Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Joel Brobecker writes: > [Apologies for the resend, Andrew - wrong email address for the gdb > mailing-list] > >> If/when this is merged I do plan to back-port this to the gdb-16-branch, >> but given the build following the suggested steps works fine, I'm not >> sure this justifies a follow up release. But I wanted to raise this for >> discussion. > > I fear that using a relative path to configure when building out-of-tree > might be fairly common. Thankfully, the workaround is relatively > straightforward, so once users get the answer, they can move forward > quickly, but getting this answer may not be straightforward. > > It might be worth doing a first corrective release right away. The bfd fix was approved and merged to master. I have also pushed the fix to the gdb-16-branch. If we did want a corrective fix then we have everything we need in place. Thanks, Andrew