From: Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <senthilkumar.selvaraj@microchip.com>
To: James Bowman <james.bowman@ftdichip.com>
Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Relaxations vs debug info
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mvcnozji.fsf@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2BB0A51F073B384698CACFD1D5A30FCC24F429@glaexch3>
James Bowman writes:
> I am working on some linker relaxations for my target, using existing
> relaxation implementations as my pattern.
>
> Everything seems to be working: relaxations are being applied, for example
> relaxation reduces the size of function foo from 0x48 to 0x38 bytes.
> Checking symbols, it looks good:
>
> $ ft32-elf-objdump -t a.out | grep foo
> 0000033c g F .text 00000038 foo
>
> However when I look at the debug info (objdump -g) I see that the size is still 0x48:
>
> <a1d> DW_AT_name : foo
> <a21> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
> <a22> DW_AT_decl_line : 51
> <a23> DW_AT_prototyped : 1
> <a23> DW_AT_type : <0x5d>
> <a27> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x33c
> <a2b> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x48
>
> Unsurprisingly this confuses gdb.
>
> My question is: in relaxation, how does the gdb info get adjusted?
1. Are you seeing relocs at the offsets for ow_pc and high_pc in the
debug_info section?
2. When relaxing, are you adjusting reloc values in debug sections as well?
If the reloc value is sym + addend, and if the relaxation occurs between
sym and addend, you'd obviously need to adjust the addend downwards.
Regards
Senthil
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-15 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-15 0:04 James Bowman
2017-03-15 5:55 ` Senthil Kumar Selvaraj [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mvcnozji.fsf@microchip.com \
--to=senthilkumar.selvaraj@microchip.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=james.bowman@ftdichip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox