From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16380 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2013 17:28:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 16349 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jan 2013 17:28:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:28:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r02HSkFx011260 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:28:46 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r02HSi9d014977 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:28:45 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Marc =?utf-8?Q?Br=C3=BCnink?= , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Tracepoints (and python) References: <464A745A-AA80-4485-820E-64C4D01A270C@nus.edu.sg> <87k3scn69b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:43:11 -0800") Message-ID: <87k3rv5wab.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 Marc> 1. Is there any technical reason why tracing is only possible on Marc> remote targets? Or is is "just" not implemented for anything else. Tom> I think the only reason is that nobody has done it. Doug> This is part of gdb/gdbserver feature parity desires right? It is on the list on the wiki, but I think just to mention it as a difference. We (meaning Red Hat) plan to tackle most of the items on that list, but I don't think this is one we are going to do. Tom