From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29808 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2013 19:09:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29797 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2013 19:09:32 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:09:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3OJ9UF2012118 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:09:31 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3OJ9Tbt024877 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:09:30 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Markus Teich Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: meaning of tags in output References: <5170EAF2.3060007@stusta.mhn.de> <87k3ntp0w6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <5176D890.6010706@stusta.mhn.de> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5176D890.6010706@stusta.mhn.de> (Markus Teich's message of "Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:53:04 +0200") Message-ID: <87k3nrn3tj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 Markus> I also use varobjects and -var-evaluate-expression, but they still Markus> contain some tags in the output. Ok, I see. Thanks. I suppose with some effort gdb could emit MI attributes instead of magic tags here. Markus>
Markus> ???seems to be for errorhandling in gdb??? Tom> I see the code, but I don't know how this could happen. Markus> If it is unreachable, it probably should be removed. I actually don't know whether or not it is unreachable. Tom