From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id JORuGXBogGFgegAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:21:36 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5FD291F0C1; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 18:21:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2E4F1E813 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 18:21:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7183A3857C51 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 22:21:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7183A3857C51 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1635805295; bh=6+qOpDaBCMTX5mWuKs5oxYVVTe+L8LcMJtTsHGPBebc=; h=To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:From; b=B8GlHNFHNAaKtio6eoOpNePJ8IlGJ52dAxfWjlrRoRnruIFlSsfhomA/4hkgcPbOk y2vuggvpTWF5U6+y49N41yXw8O+PAF2VXucF986LyAIW9d2NsmTRsOH9MfeOb8HYGw iNZRVtsX2rUnglodf8OAzXKygjA3E14JWDzUQdjI= Received: from confino.investici.org (confino.investici.org [IPv6:2a00:c38:11e:ffff::a020]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B927C3858001 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 22:19:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B927C3858001 Received: from mx1.investici.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by confino.investici.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HjnXD20kXz10xm; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 22:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.103.72.250] (mx1.investici.org [212.103.72.250]) (Authenticated sender: andrea.monaco@autistici.org) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HjnXD12XBz10xk; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 22:19:56 +0000 (UTC) To: simark@simark.ca Subject: Re: gdb 11.1: configure doesn't check for gmp existence In-Reply-To: <878ry7x3zh.fsf@autistici.org> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 23:19:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87ilxb8qno.fsf@autistici.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andrea Monaco via Gdb Reply-To: Andrea Monaco Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > Can you show the error you get? Normally, when you type "make" at > the top-level that will run the configure script in the gdb > directory, and that's when it should fail. Upon check, yes, that's what happens. But it's an unusual build system: it's common to have Makefiles in subdirectories, while multiple configures are less common. Anyway, if gmp is an essential dependency, why does the top-level configure complete without it? Andrea Monaco