From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4617 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 05:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4609 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 05:18:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.enyo.de) (212.9.189.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2002 05:18:43 -0000 Received: from [212.9.189.171] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2) id 16tM7U-0006Tx-00; Fri, 05 Apr 2002 07:18:40 +0200 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.34 #4) id 16tM7T-0006Hz-00; Fri, 05 Apr 2002 07:18:39 +0200 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 5.2 vs. Ada (and probably other unknown languages) References: <873cyhaubc.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <3CAB3231.6010801@cygnus.com> From: Florian Weimer Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 21:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3CAB3231.6010801@cygnus.com> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Wed, 03 Apr 2002 11:47:45 -0500") Message-ID: <87hemqsoy8.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: >> Is there a workaround? Even if full Ada support is not available, >> getting backtraces would be helpful in some cases. > > Definitly sounds like a new (and unknown) regression :-( > Can you create a bug report to track this > (http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/). Okay. > For a workaround, what happens if you enter ``set language c''? The problem persits. It seems to be related to DWARF2. If I compile using "-gstabs", GDB 5.1.1 works fine. > There is also a source code dropping of ACT's Ada support in: > ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/gdb/contrib/gnat/ you may find the > relevant change in there. Aidan Skinner's patch based on this appears to help, too.