Carlos O'Donell writes: > Developers, > > Anthropic is generously offering 6 months of Claude Max 20x to Free and Open > Source Software projects to support the FOSS ecosystem. These tools can be > incredibly helpful with reviewing upstream code, evaluating the conformance of > a particular interface to a standard, or just for your own learning and > exploring the implementation of the project or subsystem. Several developers often don't even refer to Coverity, but say "a static analyzer service" or similar. I think maybe some discussion should be had before naming a service (and giving some publicity) given this precedent, though it's a bit late now. > > If you are an established, active contributor to the GNU Toolchain and are > interested in having access to Claude Max 20x under Anthropic’s Claude for Open > Source program, please respond to this email thread with a short description of > how you would utilize the access and the potential impact on the GNU Toolchain. > The program's slots are limited and David Edelsohn and I plan to review the > proposals. Please keep in mind that these are individual grants from Anthropic > to you personally. If you are approved you’ll get an email from Anthropic with > further instructions. > > While the current GNU Project policy is not to accept LLM-generated content in > the projects, that still leaves other uses like bug triage, patch review, and > research as ways to use these tools. .. but also, I think we probably need to have a policy discussion about this. I hope we won't have anyone pasting LLM replies onto bugs or patch review, or an automated process doing that. I would *not* want to see something like Sashiko for example. It would seriously put me off contributing to glibc and I don't think it is respectful of contributors' time who have come to us with a bug report or patch. We should discuss this I think before handing out access. Now, if a maintainer wants to use it to aid their review (with great care), that may be more acceptable. sam