From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24876 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2009 19:26:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 24867 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2009 19:26:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.249) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:26:50 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so628579rvf.48 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:26:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.139.4 with SMTP id m4mr2424825rvd.55.1248118008923; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hydrogen.gmail.com (207-172-203-39.c3-0.upd-ubr7.trpr-upd.pa.cable.rcn.com [207.172.203.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c20sm1766595rvf.1.2009.07.20.12.26.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87fxcrdukv.wl%naesten@gmail.com> From: Samuel Bronson To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Andreas Schwab , "Catherine Smith" Subject: Re: Backtracing broken core dumps In-Reply-To: <200907192249.05343.thiago.bauermann@gmail.com> References: <8889C7D9C664436F8F547CB15F53C01C@Catherine> <200907192249.05343.thiago.bauermann@gmail.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.3 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 At Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:49:05 -0300, Thiago Bauermann wrote: > IIRC Ulrich Weigand considers that usage of the frame command to be > deprecated... I don't know the rationale though. I believe the rationale is that it doesn't actually work very well :-).