From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9465 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2012 20:53:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 9457 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2012 20:53:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:52:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1AKqr9f019662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:52:53 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1AKqqdg019558; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:52:53 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1AKqok3031908; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:52:51 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Greg McGary Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdbserver for embedded targets? References: <4F318D55.10402@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4F318D55.10402@gmail.com> (Greg McGary's message of "Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:45:09 -0700") Message-ID: <87fwei9zrx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Greg" == Greg McGary writes: Greg> Question: is the gdbserver target_ops interface suitable for such a Greg> target? I'm going to proceed under the assumption that it is, and Greg> will supplement if I find deficiencies. Greg> Comments? I don't know gdbserver very well, so I can't comment on that. There's also RDA, but I don't know if it is still live or not; but it seems like it was more explicitly targeted to this sort of thing: http://sourceware.org/rda/ Tom