From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27251 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2013 15:54:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27240 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2013 15:53:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:53:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rB4Frm2T013055 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:53:48 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-124.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.124]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB4FrksH017940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:53:47 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: lgustavo@codesourcery.com, petr.hluzin@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org, macro@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: Unreliable BFD caching heuristic References: <528E454F.6060003@codesourcery.com> <87a9gjw97b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <529DF865.2070104@codesourcery.com> <529E709F.6050008@codesourcery.com> <83a9gh46qz.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <83a9gh46qz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 04 Dec 2013 05:47:32 +0200") Message-ID: <87fvq8r4s5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: Luis> Thanks, but i don't think we would like to have windows-specific calls Luis> in such a generic portion of code. Eli> I don't understand: if you want to use inode numbers on Posix systems, Eli> which requires a Unix-specific call, then why not use Eli> GetFileInformationByHandle, which gives the Windows equivalent of the Eli> inode? IOW, if you can have _real_ inodes on Windows, why risk the Eli> fake ones? FWIW it seems fine to me as well. I'm sure one of our several existing portability mechanisms is suitable for this task. Tom