From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 7T1yMdGzm2HvfQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:14:25 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id B95731E940; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:14:25 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE341E940 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:14:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EDA385803F for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:14:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [IPv6:2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDC63858406 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:14:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org ADDC63858406 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HyW5D2qS7z1st9F; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:14:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HyW5D2djPz1qqkB; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:14:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IeKkGWX7Uv4L; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:14:07 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: TT7s5ZXiJRpr0pcx6jXQwshJV/P+EK5Ag6VyUsOrXFBJNgDitfX4mNcqJTmJRzxl Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-171-139.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.171.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:14:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 097CB2C3836; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:14:07 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Simon Sobisch via Gdb Subject: Re: Is there a way to get a function's end address other than `disassemble`? References: <60c53fa8bf160533a2eddf1da280eb50c7461a6a.camel@fit.cvut.cz> X-Yow: Send your questions to ``ASK ZIPPY'', Box 40474, San Francisco, CA 94140, USA Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:14:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Simon Sobisch via Gdb's message of "Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:54:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87fsrop6io.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Simon Sobisch Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Nov 22 2021, Simon Sobisch via Gdb wrote: > `info address func_name` will show the *start address* of the given > function, but is there any built-in way to get the *end address* other > than executing the `disassemble` command? The end address of a function isn't well defined. Part of the code could be split off into a separate section, for example. Even the start address isn't well defined. The entry address does not have to point to the lowest address of the function's code. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."