From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43474 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2016 15:34:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 43454 invoked by uid 89); 2 Sep 2016 15:34:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=friday, Friday X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 15:34:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE8A081243; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-51.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.51]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u82FYJnL023059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:34:20 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Pedro Alves Cc: Yao Qi , Joel Brobecker , "gdb\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Go C++ only References: <212bc30a-e6ad-886b-0881-8206dd91b933@redhat.com> <20160901181739.GR4538@adacore.com> <3d16afa1-fba3-4543-4232-d6c952ea4556@redhat.com> X-URL: http://blog.sergiodj.net Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 15:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3d16afa1-fba3-4543-4232-d6c952ea4556@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:15:07 +0100") Message-ID: <87eg521fk4.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 On Friday, September 02 2016, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 09/02/2016 11:01 AM, Yao Qi wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> >>> I don't have a strong opinion, but can we perhaps try a compromise >>> where we would be using C++ features only in new units (unlikely to be >>> backported)? Even though the backporting rate is indeed probably low, >>> it would still be nice to make it as easy as possible. Or is this >>> not really a practical suggestion? >>> >> >> I agree. If we think the patch is likely to be backported, such as bug fix, >> C++ feature is not allowed in the patch. > > Agreed. > > Sergio, can you switch the buildbot builder that is catching C > build regressions to test the 7.12 branch instead of master? Hm, I can try, yes. I'll let you know if it works. Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/