From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24589 invoked by alias); 30 May 2014 01:57:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21463 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2014 01:57:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org Received: from plane.gmane.org (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 30 May 2014 01:57:27 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WqC4R-0001wa-RF for gdb@sourceware.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 03:57:23 +0200 Received: from 207-172-123-137.c3-0.upd-ubr1.trpr-upd.pa.cable.rcn.com ([207.172.123.137]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 03:57:23 +0200 Received: from naesten by 207-172-123-137.c3-0.upd-ubr1.trpr-upd.pa.cable.rcn.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 03:57:23 +0200 To: gdb@sourceware.org From: Samuel Bronson Subject: Re: patchwork.sourceware.org is live! Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 02:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87d2ewdo60.fsf@naesten.mooo.com> References: <20140523211338.GK12497@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <5382E7F2.4020506@suse.com> <5382EF22.4060705@suse.com> <5382F50E.7040702@suse.com> <20140526102052.GA18682@domone> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 Ondřej Bílka writes: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:02:22AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> On 05/26/2014 09:52 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> > That's a good idea. I have modified the current document[1] and also >> > added the Committed status to the document. Once we have consensus on >> > adding the new 'Committed' status, I'll also add it to patchwork. >> > >> > Siddhesh >> > [1] https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Patch%20Review%20Workflow >> > Are there any objections to the new state? > That should be set automatically. I use a following script to detect > commited patches. If there are no objections, I guess the script will need to be changed to put patches in the "Committed" state instead of the "Accepted" state? However, really I'd prefer if it could give some indication as to *which* commit(s) the patch was committed as, and it doesn't look like this is viable with the current approach, since you seem to just test if each patch can be applied backwards to HEAD. Oh, but now I notice that that *particular* script is glibc-only anyway, so maybe I don't really care that much ... -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!