From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2964 invoked by alias); 19 May 2012 02:17:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 2952 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2012 02:17:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 May 2012 02:17:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4J2H3c1017672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 May 2012 22:17:03 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4J2H1bF020578 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 18 May 2012 22:17:02 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pedro Alves , Jan Kratochvil , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? References: <20120330161403.GA17891@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87aa2rjkb8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F832D5B.9030308@redhat.com> <87ehqhfenc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120518215558.GR29339@adacore.com> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 02:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120518215558.GR29339@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 18 May 2012 14:55:58 -0700") Message-ID: <87aa14ewyq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> For GDBserver, however, which is often cross-compiled to bare Joel> systems, I feel that getting a C++ compiler could be even more Joel> challenging that on those exotic but otherwise relatively rich Joel> platforms. Ok. I think in that case we must drop this idea. That's too bad, but I guess we will soldier on. Tom