From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id gJGCKh3aRmNdKAsAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:15:41 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id A9B611E112; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:15:41 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20201203 header.b=nQuhaxeU; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E74771E0CB for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:15:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD7238AA264 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:15:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274243857372; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:15:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 274243857372 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:73:8b7:7001:c8aa:b65f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECEA32DC; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net ECEA32DC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1665587713; bh=FDtzG66g5jXInnOAxG2snbIc+ALzOXFz42R6RiX1zIA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=nQuhaxeU5usrFqLBgs3zLnz97NhLmD7IMcpyuTxB/DiI9LmJnkgmQ8E8kde2i7lCg PfHgXbCEKmQDAVlKqrW1w7IJsIpfC/nj/uCe1LzguUwJzwFcSf+aGt/0sEPWjp31/E dl29pzmmD+MZljv6SdVgcIYBWAneGq9TX19uOOyRZiUK9slKPGnK4lDuMXaSQ+ODGD 2OW+dDH4uFtzEreoLG/N1ENSDCB5aHeVO+ETNDxB5e6qT7tKdOUG9IvFPTGdlkL7x9 miKXLjWMLvvvpSyg7rkSvuDXHEVNYSy3TkP/QJRouZs34VvT5+kEDCkwnaGr2VLY/V 6sDasDtl5kHlw== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mark Wielaard , David Edelsohn Subject: Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project In-Reply-To: References: <6f6d141b-b776-8707-2c91-dc38d20aa9e1@gotplt.org> <20221004171007.oc2ot6eu6l24aipn@cgf.cx> <05b0f7fa-7077-5a8b-0c2f-dfb3068dd10f@gotplt.org> <517db8de93ece0eb81923fd05a731ca1da65e1dd.camel@klomp.org> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:15:12 -0600 Message-ID: <87a661kr9b.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Overseers mailing list , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Mark Wielaard writes: > Then lets just let the past be the past. Now that the proposal is > public lets discuss it publicly. There have been various question > about the details on the overseers list. Lets just discuss those and > see how we can move forward. Along those lines, I asked a few questions back in September: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/2022q3/018906.html They seem relevant for anybody wanting to understand this proposal, and the answers should be at the fingertips of the people putting it together. Any chance the rest of us could be enlightened? Thanks, jon