From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id k1aqFH+H8WY2ozQAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:21:35 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=AgMyaWm4; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3A6FA1E353; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:21:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE,URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B35331E05C for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:21:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593D7385840B for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:21:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 593D7385840B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1727104894; bh=nmx5f1FqmVWppTZ3gDkHagZg99/kSYT7gfP8Mc5f+OE=; h=To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=AgMyaWm4zyTgWtvJuI6tiWfSN7PHF4b6eQosuO23DQpeJO5hsnOjhBqlvAogn30bY J88ZjKItphM2mDy/CY235bLuXZMJ70NKGkm7Oz3Gy7BnGIr3tg5kmVi55dsQm3ol4i JBfn3kZ7dcuaIWtvoo+jfFmFaOm+z3uHt/3w67+0= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA5E3858C5F for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:20:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org DBA5E3858C5F ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org DBA5E3858C5F ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1727104852; cv=none; b=uTifmfC4jfAq1JzJE9gCAegG+MrwAp1bqEFfCgiYB3lTO1eSfSqn1vvScZdMakCJGr99H+ZkwWXmuoaKmYX/vcNi0OpA8fWxX4dkNovtypiHfbeQP3+M1NlH6meyGDniXUz9sQaTaAUBeUdvpBW3RMov/xwPLrcPjB2IJ3v5Yqc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1727104852; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T2yBxNlaMh1c0id4Dj/Gfn2efVwrL9lipgDQOmAQ35M=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=NPrnevUkxBuHDxkcJ8jssUxsGKILFw0YDrhrlwLPHnMA3pJa2TSOpY45IfWLh0unmQLvfIAJsMHh2o+wxiP7GqpRvNhdraR2MuA3l9f3W3VIb6kg4E5fhUWu0v+lUpJeg2rGEB09m7e3lPFzRUHRpSLLKewqPR0bDJK17pFwtTE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-630-pQVDMm82NOiAnSqhdhTo_g-1; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:20:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: pQVDMm82NOiAnSqhdhTo_g-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (unknown [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C6DA18E6D24; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.224.196]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC03A1955DE3; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:20:30 +0000 (UTC) To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: Thomas Koenig , Joseph Myers , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain In-Reply-To: (Jonathan Wakely's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:23:17 +0100") References: <55715cf9-0f6c-4525-a310-7945db72dc21@netcologne.de> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:20:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87a5fyv1l0.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Florian Weimer via Gdb Reply-To: Florian Weimer Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" * Jonathan Wakely: > The discussion is about how we do patch submission and patch review. > The GitHub pull request workflow is widely seen as simpler than our > current email-based workflow (not everybody agrees, of course). The > idea is to *lower* the barrier of entry for contributors, not raise > it. It should also help those who feel unsure about their use of Git because the reviewers see exactly what ends up getting merged (at least with the default workflow). With the email-based workflow, that isn't the case, and I know it makes some people feel nervous. Thanks, Florian