From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5605 invoked by alias); 27 May 2002 09:38:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5577 invoked from network); 27 May 2002 09:38:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO punt.aladdin.de) (212.14.90.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 May 2002 09:38:08 -0000 Received: by punt.aladdin.de; id LAA23068; Mon, 27 May 2002 11:47:57 +0200 Received: from panther.ealaddin.org(10.20.1.96) by punt.aladdin.de via smap (3.2) id xmab23062; Mon, 27 May 02 11:47:28 +0200 Received: from panther.aladdin.de.aladdin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by panther.aladdin.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA15924; Mon, 27 May 2002 11:37:57 +0200 To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Cc: chris@groessler.org Subject: Re: obselete configurations & the top level From: Christian Groessler Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 02:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87661a53t6.fsf@panther.aladdin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 On 05/26/2002 10:42:57 PM MST Stan Shebs wrote: > >Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> >> This is a query. A bunch of configurations have been obseleted and >> removed from GCC recently. These have all, I believe, been obseleted >> and removed from GDB already. >> >> There is special-case code for many of these configurations in >> configure.in. I would like to get rid of it. >> >> What else do I need to check before I get rid of these cases? Are any >> of them possibly still supported by binutils? > >While it's certainly conceivable that some targets should be >binutils-only (z8k is almost in that category for instance), z8k is also supported by gdb. regards, chris