From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7540 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2011 16:46:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 7511 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2011 16:46:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:46:39 +0000 Received: from [213.157.30.140] (port=37549 helo=termi.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBrav-0006EA-6k; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:46:37 -0400 From: jemarch@gnu.org (Jose E. Marchesi) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Work on the SIS ERC32 Emulator References: <87k4erg3ip.fsf@gnu.org> <20110418163319.GE2402@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110418163319.GE2402@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:33:19 -0700") Message-ID: <8762qbseb0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2 > - The copyright holder of the modified code would be my Employer. That > seems reasonable given that SIS is copyrighted by ESA and/or Jiri > Gaisler. Unfortunately, I don't think that this is going to be possible. The FSF should be assigned the copyright for all software contributions to GDB. Ok. I though the policy was different for the sims, since they are full of non-FSF copyrighted code. All right, I have to talk with my Employer about this. I am pretty familiar with the copyright assignment process with the FSF, but my Employer is not and it may take some time. > - We would prefer to release the code under GPLv3+, but GPLv2+ would be > fine as well. We have transitioned GDB to GPL v3, so that's not going to be a problem. Do you plan to upgrade the files under 'sis' from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+? -- Jose E. Marchesi jemarch@gnu.org GNU Project http://www.gnu.org