From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-42089-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18252 invoked by alias); 3 May 2013 11:15:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 18237 invoked by uid 89); 3 May 2013 11:15:16 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.110)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 May 2013 11:15:15 +0000
Received: from /spool/local	by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted	for <gdb@sourceware.org> from <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;	Fri, 3 May 2013 12:09:41 +0100
Received: from d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.15)	by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted;	Fri, 3 May 2013 12:09:37 +0100
Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194])	by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD7E1B0805F	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri,  3 May 2013 12:15:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.216])	by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r43BEw6h48889984	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 11:14:58 GMT
Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])	by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r43BF8jj031151	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 05:15:08 -0600
Received: from br87z6lw.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-143.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.143])	by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id r43BF8sV031125	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 05:15:08 -0600
From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: gdb.arch vs. gdb.base gcore test cases
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 11:15:00 -0000
Message-ID: <8761z0gvr7.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-TM-AS-MML: No
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 13050311-1948-0000-0000-0000050AAB3E
X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2

The following two test cases are mostly identical, and their associated
C source files are exactly identical:

    gdb.arch/system-gcore.exp
    gdb.base/gcore.exp

Is there any specific reason for the two copies?  Just curious...