From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20784 invoked by alias); 19 May 2006 02:31:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 20774 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2006 02:31:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from jess.glam.ac.uk (HELO jess.glam.ac.uk) (193.63.147.97) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 02:30:24 +0000 Received: from mailserv1.isd.glam.ac.uk ([192.168.244.1]) by jess.glam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1FgubL-0001SU-00; Fri, 19 May 2006 03:20:27 +0100 Received: from floppsie ([193.63.148.84]) by MAILSERV1.isd.glam.ac.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 May 2006 03:30:20 +0100 Received: from gaius by floppsie with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FguVf-00081J-Ud; Fri, 19 May 2006 03:14:35 +0100 To: Nick Roberts Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Entry for Modula-2 changes in NEWS? References: <20060516203644.GD27234@adacore.com> <87sln9r5qw.fsf@glam.ac.uk> <20060517154255.GF12531@adacore.com> <17515.48544.417366.455132@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> From: Gaius Mulley Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 02:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <17515.48544.417366.455132@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Message-ID: <874pzm4v78.fsf@glam.ac.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00296.txt.bz2 Nick Roberts writes: > > I am happy to submit these changes for approval, but I think it would > > make more sense if you did it. What do you think? Once approved, I can > > port the change to the branch as well, if you prefer. It's not > > difficult, but you need to check out the branch, which takes a bit of > > time. I already have done it on my side. > > Or presumably copy the working directory and update to the branch: > > cp -r src src_6_5 > cd src_6_5 > cvs up -r gdb_6_5-branch > > which should be a lot quicker. Hi, thanks for that trick.. regards, Gaius