From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9918 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2013 17:49:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 9907 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Feb 2013 17:49:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:49:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1DHnSZx032105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:49:28 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1DHnRCZ009928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:49:28 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Kai Schuetz Cc: "gdb\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Crash triggered by DWARF debug info: Any ideas ? References: <15151570812B8041A31A98C098B7E75104291D@DE02WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com> <87liatnxmi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <15151570812B8041A31A98C098B7E751042EDC@DE02WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15151570812B8041A31A98C098B7E751042EDC@DE02WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com> (Kai Schuetz's message of "Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:45:11 +0000") Message-ID: <874nhgm7dk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Kai" == Kai Schuetz writes: Kai> What is the relation of DWARF info and (static?) blocks ? Kai> I assume there should be one static block per compilation unit ? Yeah. There is a comment in block.h that explains it. Basically each CU has a global block and a static block, and then various sub-blocks representing scopes in the program. Kai> With "newer gdb" I assume you refer to one checked out CVS since 7.5.1 Kai> is the latest release ? Yes, or git. Tom