From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14058 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2013 17:01:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14048 invoked by uid 89); 22 Nov 2013 17:01:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:00:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAMH0hPK028594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:00:43 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-124.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.124]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAMH0bwX016176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:00:38 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Yao Qi , "gdb\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: semantics of dynamic varobj References: <528F5839.4050100@codesourcery.com> <87eh68e7qk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <528F8856.9030606@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <528F8856.9030606@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:37:42 +0000") Message-ID: <874n74e5hm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I no longer have the full context, but these varobjs are also Pedro> only enabled when the client requests them (a new option Pedro> to -var-create, IIRC). Ok, thanks. It wasn't clear from the thread whether the issues were apparent. I'm fine with an implementation that takes them into account. Tom