From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3699 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2002 17:23:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3690 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2002 17:23:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jun 2002 17:23:00 -0000 Received: from fleche.redhat.com (ta0199.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.199]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05383 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:22:58 -0600 Received: by fleche.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 825574F80AA; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:36:05 -0600 (MDT) To: Gdb List Subject: Proposal for gettextizing From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: Are we THERE yet?! Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <873cvbfegq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 Andrew suggested posting this here. Once a few gettext patches have gone in, I'd like to have pure string-wrapping patches (those that don't change the logic of the code in any other way) be considered obvious, so that I can just check them in. I'll continue to submit other patches as usual. Comments? Objections? Tom