From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27639 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2014 17:07:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27623 invoked by uid 89); 29 Apr 2014 17:07:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:07:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3TH7Yej023759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:07:35 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-185.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.185]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3TH7XhX000479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:07:33 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Gary Benson , Stan Shebs , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Patchwork patch tracking system References: <20140402100842.GA956@blade.nx> <533F3713.40700@earthlink.net> <20140417135040.GA891@blade.nx> <20140422130652.GG5790@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20140422130652.GG5790@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:06:52 -0700") Message-ID: <8738gw6p4b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 Joel> There is a tool that we use internally at AdaCore which I was starting Joel> to think of proposing for GDB, called geritt. From what I have been Joel> able to see from patchwork's webpage, geritt seems like a much more Joel> advanced system compared to patchwork. But the tradeoff is that using Joel> geritt requires a bit more work as well, and that part or all of Joel> the review process would happen on geritt, rather than the mailing-list. Joel> It's not very intuitive at first, but it is very easy and lightweight. I was keen on gerrit until I read this: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-02/msg00232.html Maybe phabricator is better for our needs? I've been trying the patchworks install as well. I don't find it all that useful myself, but maybe it would be better if more people were using it. Tom