From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: SEGV on display /i $pc with i386 target
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86k7m9p9v9.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Christopher Faylor's message of "Thu, 29 Aug 2002 01:51:03 -0400"
Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> writes:
> I just noticed a SEGV whenever I do a 'display /i $pc' on cygwin.
>
> I tried building a gdb for linux to see what was going wrong on
> cygwin but it isn't much better:
>
> (top-gdb) display /i $pc
> 1: x/i $(null) 0x8072f42 <main+6>: push $0x6
>
> The problem comes from the fact that, while gdb understands that
> $pc == $eip, it doesn't seem to know how to rename $pc to $eip
> when it is outputting the register name. You can get the same
> behavior by doing something like 'display /i $ps', too (even
> if that doesn't make sense it shouldn't SEGV).
Hmm, this defenitely used to work in the past. Does anybody have an
idea what broke it?
> The simplest way to fix this is to extend the i386_register_names array
> to include builtin register names, however, maybe the right way to fix
> this is to add something to builtin-reg.c.
I suspect this problem isn't i386-specific, so extending
i386_register_names seems to be the wrong approach to me.
> I noticed that i386_register_names seems to have 41 elements while
> the sum of NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS == 40. Is that intentional?
Sort of. In the current situation, Depending on whether your target
supports the SSE registers NUM_REGS will be either 32 or 41. Since
NUM_PSEUDO_REGS is 6, and 32 + 6 = 40.
Perhaps this is a good moment to warn you about an implication of
multi-arching the i386 for Cygwin: the Cygwin targets don't support
SSE anymor, since we use the "Unknown" OS/ABI for Cygwin right now. I
doubt whether this is what you want. You probably want to introduce
some sort of Cygwin or Win32 OS/ABI that includes those registers.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-29 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-28 22:51 Christopher Faylor
2002-08-29 15:40 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2002-08-29 18:05 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-08-29 20:37 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-08-29 20:53 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-09-02 13:26 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86k7m9p9v9.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
--to=kettenis@chello.nl \
--cc=cgf@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox