From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id mC1KNlyVcGY8WzsAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:58:20 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=U71Kox4b; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D8B611E0C1; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:58:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C387A1E092 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:58:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB713882049 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:58:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5EB713882049 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1718654298; bh=2MmjbAlwG8H644+pvzD/5+EOk4IFCqt+13aqk2hA8IA=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=U71Kox4bmC6/OGk0v8fyp46buCo0fuH+bJKquje+sOj7E93CmJysBd3QPxpSK37dY HJeWDRuKfTt2rEEEUFhjOa2/ecZHUhk1x+2+GA/leELcv2Qig5bff8irk0g+SyAlBz 2MZl8X4gLWLiOuWD7Z9RIRw1FxJT1RXp8y16uGK4= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E8F5387543F; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:57:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0E8F5387543F ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 0E8F5387543F ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718654259; cv=none; b=IqOuDfDfR35yB1ElZCKohhiOxDIqcyAqYDHBItAn29fi6LUMNoOuH64wYzaZGUKQHCuJXUVQ5qaw4CBEf1Eqk+4mRJBGImaDAP6SJ5/viNnINpq9ScjBfXeGQ/OUgwsCalPI9vOg1pirfZ3UB6n8PaiiRUYMhDp+A3Z6i15Nsew= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718654259; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w67ihOZX+mnJhy8Zwn9RCKdcT5MnStGcKTq6ruvCgpU=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=Kajc0MFf9leeA3opGEIqhzm9CXinjHU2R4JTByeIB6tBSceXbeJmZ5M/I/IEse6zZszSSSOFnDSvcEnVNv2Rg4d2Uc+g3k5KtJI+poTeTUycNuaOrOkADuBTchxVWtcarblRUDQl1GjZCWVQ6q4WrWuZlk4EgM0rsn7pPfkIzKQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJITx-0006wW-L7; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:57:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 22:57:34 +0300 Message-Id: <86jzinqr4h.fsf@gnu.org> To: Andrew Pinski Cc: blarsen@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (message from Andrew Pinski on Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:24:03 -0700) Subject: Re: DCO: Was: Re: Contributing to gdb References: <86538dac-6c3a-4b9e-9de9-3906e645fa4d@redhat.com> <86sexbr0mb.fsf@gnu.org> <0bd8f510-8782-4052-880c-39232e69b432@redhat.com> <86r0cvr00e.fsf@gnu.org> <7c9378e8-287d-4d35-b294-3c112bb8fe1b@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > From: Andrew Pinski > Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:24:03 -0700 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org > > The main reason why I brought this up because I know in the near > future (within a year) I will be wanting to help improve/implementing > GDB for aarch64 windows and currently my employer (Qualcomm) does not > have a blanket copyright right assignment and has been ok with the DCO > for submitting patches for GCC and glibc. So this will definitely get > in the way for me here. You should talk to the FSF lawyers, because I'm not sure you can contribute based on a DCO in that case. Your employer can claim they have the legal rights for the code you wrote.