From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34478-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30202 invoked by alias); 25 May 2009 14:59:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 30189 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2009 14:59:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FS_NEW_XXX,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-bw0-f165.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f165.google.com) (209.85.218.165)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:58:54 +0000
Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so3374415bwz.24         for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Mon, 25 May 2009 07:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.126.69 with SMTP id b5mr3658219fas.34.1243263531352; Mon,  	25 May 2009 07:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8502af3c0905250017i13c3c01mf5a567ae41490266@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8502af3c0905140623nece4f1dv1e03c2c841c59e42@mail.gmail.com> 	 <1242311828.2994.39.camel@thomas> 	 <8502af3c0905200126v68b6d474g9ee399bc163e8b5@mail.gmail.com> 	 <20090520141243.GE17566@adacore.com> 	 <8502af3c0905220524w71078d01kb4d95dc303775c2@mail.gmail.com> 	 <20090522144255.GB23036@adacore.com> 	 <8502af3c0905250017i13c3c01mf5a567ae41490266@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:59:00 -0000
Message-ID: <8502af3c0905250758h437b5c09tea25e684193e3dae@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: new port
From: Florent DEFAY <spira.inhabitant@gmail.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2

I finally resolved my problem. It was caused by "this_id" which was not set
as soon as the prologue begins but some instructions later.

Regards.

Florent

2009/5/25 Florent DEFAY <spira.inhabitant@gmail.com>:
> Thank you for reply.
>
>>> What is shocking me is "Outermost frame: unwinder did not report frame =
ID"
>>> and "Previous frame's sp" which has the same value as "frame at".
>>
>> I assume that frame 0 is for the call to "foo". What does "bt" say
>> in this situation?
>
> "Stack level 0" is returned whatever the function, whatever the real
> stack level.
> bt says
> #0 =A0main () at main.c:44
> in main and
> #0 =A0foo (a=3D25) at main.c:6
> in foo.
>
> Regards.
>
> Florent
>