From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34421-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20796 invoked by alias); 17 May 2009 20:08:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 20784 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2009 20:08:55 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 May 2009 20:08:46 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KJT00B0015VQB00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 23:08:43 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.115.215]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KJT00INV1AIQDG0@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Sun, 17 May 2009 23:08:43 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 20:08:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: update on the gdb-7.0 branch/release
In-reply-to: <20090508205101.GJ675@adacore.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83zldbpk50.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20090505173540.GB894@adacore.com> <m3vdobcuvb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20090508205101.GJ675@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:51:01 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> > Joel> Given all that, I'm not sure it's wise to try to push for a release
> > Joel> before the summit. 
> > 
> > Sounds good.
> 
> OK -@this point, we're defering the branch creation. Pedro also
> expressed the opinion that we should fix the blocking issues first.
> 
> I'd like us to be a little bit proactive@fixing the last few
> issues, so as to take avantage of my availability in June. July
> and August are going to be crazy for me.

So what's the current consensus about an approximate dates for the
GDB 7.0 branch and release?

I'm not applying any pressure, just would like to know the time frame,
so I could plan my work on the DJGPP port of GDB accordingly.  June
will be quite hectic for me as well.

TIA