From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id QHisDoIa7mNLbDUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 06:58:58 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3A10E1E222; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 06:58:58 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=u5CIyhdM; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 933821E110 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 06:58:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D150D3856975 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:58:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D150D3856975 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1676548736; bh=/TXMuhUFo1ldhbUJZnQM0Kfx1w9xfAmXEVyPM8MKQto=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=u5CIyhdMX+YgETizhL3+8+ygnMiB7+rq849owm5AUjWStg6+yMa6jMdqxB0XM5Krf 9koa0RaG3sjwTg8xFGBuBbkul8QtObuu26RY3UOTVmPJNw4ntbfjZUyJTaP6cKOn3S lSs6DBWOds8GnL3X/AxhXFfkxsxR+GLwfO95dDw0= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B299F3858C5F for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:58:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B299F3858C5F Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pScuC-0007Zu-Su; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 06:58:28 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pScuC-00042R-C0; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 06:58:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:58:22 +0200 Message-Id: <83zg9d7rfl.fsf@gnu.org> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: mark@klomp.org, aburgess@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, luis.machado@arm.com, simark@simark.ca, gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (message from Joel Brobecker via Gdb on Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:16:21 +0400) Subject: Re: Any concrete plans after the GDB BoF? References: <87mt5kunum.fsf@redhat.com> <20230212124345.GH2430@gnu.wildebeest.org> <87r0utu6ew.fsf@redhat.com> <65409b73-fc6d-9a89-3541-31eb1a0b0791@arm.com> <87bklxtx7r.fsf@redhat.com> <7112932f-4260-2f33-e619-c7130e0abb20@arm.com> <87zg9fkmt4.fsf@redhat.com> <20230216095159.GD6028@gnu.wildebeest.org> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:16:21 +0400 > Cc: Andrew Burgess , > Joel Brobecker , > Luis Machado , Simon Marchi , > Simon Marchi via Gdb > From: Joel Brobecker via Gdb > > There are not a whole lot of hosting platforms out there, so my concern > is that, by making email integration a requirement, you're automatically > eliminating a number of solutions which could answer your requirements > just as well, only just differently, and from there, lose some great > features out there. Please also take into consideration the other side of this: switching to a web-based discussions makes participation via email all but impractical. People tend to answer short answers without quoting the context, assuming that all the context is visible in the web form anyway, and that makes email messages undecipherable. I follow one such repository, which uses GitHub, for more than a year, and it is very frustrating. So if good support for email is not a requirement, we need to consider the consequences of basically abandoning email entirely.