From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-35389-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19450 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2009 19:35:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 19441 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2009 19:35:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (HELO mtaout1.012.net.il) (84.95.2.1)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:35:37 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KPB00H004QS1F00@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:35:35 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.144.38]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KPB003AG53AI250@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:35:35 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:35:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Build question
In-reply-to: <1251828295.6106.119.camel@pavilion>
To: danny.backx@scarlet.be
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83y6oy8nox.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1250803105.11282.96.camel@pavilion> <m3fxbl2jib.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83d46pgjkq.fsf@gnu.org> <1250877901.11282.116.camel@pavilion> <83ab1tgh9h.fsf@gnu.org> <1250880746.11282.128.camel@pavilion> <m3r5v425lu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1250931899.11282.142.camel@pavilion> <83skfkfa4n.fsf@gnu.org> <1251095160.16357.352.camel@pavilion> <1251828295.6106.119.camel@pavilion>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2

> From: Danny Backx <danny.backx@scarlet.be>
> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org
> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:04:55 +0200
> 
> Apart from that, HAVE_DOS_BASED_FILE_SYSTEM is used in a number of
> sources (even though filenames.h appears to do much already) :
> ./libiberty/make-relative-prefix.c
> ./libiberty/basename.c
> ./libiberty/lbasename.c
> ./include/filenames.h
> ./bfd/archive.c
> ./gdb/utils.c
> ./gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
> ./gdb/completer.c
> ./gdb/symtab.c
> ./gdb/source.c

One more thing: libiberty is a bit tricky, because it is used in many
projects apart of GDB, which might have their own ideas about the
appropriateness of using the DOS file-name semantics.  So I would
leave that alone in the first approximation.