From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 8GucFm8XQWPDwAcAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 02:23:43 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5A6D81E112; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 02:23:43 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=XOlYyLT0; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1725F1E0D5 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 02:23:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF1C389EC3D for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 06:23:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8CF1C389EC3D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1665210222; bh=YSuIOsCjvTOqbu//2BoGVzwOvLoLYzguLfr5iLGciRQ=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=XOlYyLT0H3IAbp+7RqfBmCErnyksPKt3XXmTwnzUxAdSeX8DeJLr2kfaqCb2lZQLn hbUk25/oeMU0Ed0bwNSe3SonyLZOnf0L9bh9fL1KmcE5wvHBZLyZxHq9VanCfvmnLI kOCSYL/4y34EIDhO+9oYTM1lOJyuJx972XNTQ1qo= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AF913858CDB for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 06:23:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8AF913858CDB Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oh3Ev-0003Mt-9h; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 02:23:13 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3730 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oh3Eu-0004Z5-5m; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 02:23:12 -0400 Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 09:23:14 +0300 Message-Id: <83y1tqltpp.fsf@gnu.org> To: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <754258e5-b9b7-0785-5580-f8f54e7ad6ad@simark.ca> (message from Simon Marchi via Gdb on Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:46:23 -0400) Subject: Re: Proposal: Add review tags to patch review workflow. References: <754258e5-b9b7-0785-5580-f8f54e7ad6ad@simark.ca> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:46:23 -0400 > From: Simon Marchi via Gdb > > We don't really have a formal process for voting / adopting proposals > like this. Given there was no negative feedback at all (from what I > remember), please go ahead and update the wiki. I will try to remember > to use the tags from now on. It would help if the new rules for using the tags were posted here as well, I think. Then, if someone has questions or wants to request clarifications, they could do that right away, instead of waiting until the first time they need to use the new rules. Thanks.