From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28068 invoked by alias); 21 May 2014 18:03:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28052 invoked by uid 89); 21 May 2014 18:03:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout25.012.net.il Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il (HELO mtaout25.012.net.il) (80.179.55.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2014 18:03:06 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N5X00L00R8JMB00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 20:59:58 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N5X00FP2RBYTE60@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Wed, 21 May 2014 20:59:58 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:03:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Patchwork patch tracking system In-reply-to: <537CDFCE.7000407@redhat.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: tromey@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gbenson@redhat.com, stanshebs@earthlink.net, gdb@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83wqdfm2l9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20140402100842.GA956@blade.nx> <533F3713.40700@earthlink.net> <20140417135040.GA891@blade.nx> <20140422130652.GG5790@adacore.com> <8738gw6p4b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87tx8jnq7j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <537CDFCE.7000407@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:18:06 +0100 > From: Pedro Alves > CC: Gary Benson , Stan Shebs , gdb@sourceware.org > > The fact that the ChangeLog is usually not a part of the patch > and then is added before push changes the hash. But that's just for historical reasons, right? If we use git-changelog-merge, there should be no reason not to make ChangeLog changes part of the patch, right? > given we only allow fast-forward, it's very frequent that patches > need to be rebased when pushed, which changes hash as well. Does this mean I cannot push after merging from my local branch into master in my repository? IOW, if I have local feature branches, do I have to rebase commits from those branches before pushing them?