From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id zKnPOAL7EmDiegAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:57:22 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D2E8E1EF80; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:57:22 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DDAB1E945 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:57:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9240386EC70; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:57:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A9240386EC70 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1611856641; bh=Nhjdz84FWDs7QywGA9s96KnykIUw3c4sVe+gyZLC9uE=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=hNKN3oC9FTo3IIEYSygz+MANNU2ZL7ZL19e8RwzkaA1JMeI5Yb8tzVk/4yEAsnEJQ SlVa3b0fRo1yyYUsfr/z0LeXuhpmKHpKV2H5Tc0NUkOJXqEJnMlcm36KZKkCwrOUns TZbtKx8Sq9RE6wPIIr0b2v1KqM8/yQHvzVsyoSCU= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 349593861826 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:57:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 349593861826 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5BXi-0005JY-8y; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:57:19 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4433 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l5BXf-0004uI-8U; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:57:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 19:57:27 +0200 Message-Id: <83wnvxx7ug.fsf@gnu.org> To: Peng Yu In-Reply-To: (message from Peng Yu on Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:37:20 -0600) Subject: Re: How to display instructions around the current instuction? References: <83y2gdx9ae.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > From: Peng Yu > Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:37:20 -0600 > Cc: stefan.puiu@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org > > I have already thanked other people who send correct answers. But > helping by definition should making sure the answers are correctly. It > is not a valid excuse to say to post untested wrong results are OK > because of "helping". > > If an answers is not correct, it should not be sent in the first > place. In stackoverflow, wrong answers can be deleted. But mailing > lists don't have this options. Therefore, the senders should make sure > the correctness of the answers before sending them out. With such an attitude, don't expect anyone to help you when you ask next time. You have a lot to learn about politeness and humility (rudeness you already learned only too well).