From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18623 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2009 18:55:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 18611 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Oct 2009 18:55:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.7) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:55:08 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KRF00B000GHG200@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:55:05 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.84.229]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KRF00C120JSSVO0@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:55:05 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:55:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [discuss] Process record -- save and restore to a file In-reply-to: <4AD35518.9040606@vmware.com> To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83vdikigow.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4AD35518.9040606@vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:11:04 -0700 > From: Michael Snyder > > I would like to remark that the "restore" UI is logical but not > intuitive. I think it would be helpful to have a single command eg: > > (gdb) record load > > which would do the same as the "core" and "record" commands. I'm for it. > Secondly, I have a suggestion about the command names. > How about > record save > record restore > instead of > record dump > record load I could go either way, but maybe you are right: "dump" and "load" are two words with overloaded meanings.