From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-44422-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 78367 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2015 15:14:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 78352 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jun 2015 15:14:02 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:14:00 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NPZ00H00RHXFR00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:13:24 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NPZ00HR3RMBDJ30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:13:23 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:14:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Inadvertently run inferior threads
In-reply-to: <557ECCA5.7050506@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83vbepngxm.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83h9tq3zu3.fsf@gnu.org> <55043A63.6020103@redhat.com> <8361a339xd.fsf@gnu.org> <5504555C.804@redhat.com> <550458E0.10206@redhat.com> <83y4jrsgui.fsf@gnu.org> <557ECCA5.7050506@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:01:25 +0100
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> CC: gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> > 	  if (!tp->control.in_infcall)
> > 	    set_running (user_visible_resume_ptid (user_step), 1);
> > 
> > it winds up calling 'set_running', because the in_infcall flag is set
> > on the thread that called the inferior function, not on the thread
> > which was started and triggered TARGET_WAITKIND_SPURIOUS.
> > 
> > So 'set_running' is called, and it is called with minus_one_ptid,
> > which then has the effect of marking all the threads as running.
> 
> So that should mean that even for GNU/Linux, it should be possible
> to end in the exact same, when any thread other than the one that we
> had started the infcall in reports an event that doesn't cause a stop.
> E.g., a thread specific breakpoint, a "handle nostop" signal, etc.

Does that involve minus_one_ptid on GNU/Linux as well?  If not, that
call will not mark all threads as running, will it?