From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34288-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16090 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2009 19:23:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 16080 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2009 19:23:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.7)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:22:56 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KIV00J00MX15000@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:22:52 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.230.216]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KIV00F4MN63UZC0@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:22:52 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:24:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Debugging a frameless function
In-reply-to: <20090429191216.GA30562@caradoc.them.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83tz47clik.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83zldzco0p.fsf@gnu.org> <20090429183946.GA28155@caradoc.them.org> <83ws93cmp0.fsf@gnu.org> <20090429191216.GA30562@caradoc.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:12:16 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> Mark's got a good point - some older GCC's just botch the debug info.
> What compiler are we looking at here?

GCC 3.4.3.