From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17386 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2018 17:44:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16504 invoked by uid 89); 6 Mar 2018 17:44:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:44:39 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etGde-0006D4-P0 for gdb@sourceware.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 12:44:37 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etGde-0006Ch-Kz; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 12:44:34 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2026 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1etGde-0007LV-19; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 12:44:34 -0500 Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:44:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83sh9dqeti.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jan Vrany CC: gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <1520352887.16358.25.camel@fit.cvut.cz> (message from Jan Vrany on Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:14:47 +0000) Subject: Re: Compiling GDB on Windows using mingw64 toolchain Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1520183955.32035.2.camel@fit.cvut.cz> <1520334268.16358.20.camel@fit.cvut.cz> <83bmg1rybg.fsf@gnu.org> <1520352887.16358.25.camel@fit.cvut.cz> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 > From: Jan Vrany > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:14:47 +0000 > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 17:57 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > > > > Doesn't MinGW64 have the wint_t type? Because if it does, that part > > of wchar.in.h should have been bypassed in your build. > > I believe it does have it. Following compile just fine: > -- > #include > int main(int argc, char **argv) { > ::wint_t a; > wint_t b; > return 0; > } Then I guess you need to look in the config.log to understand why the configure-time test for it failed.