From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26683 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2013 18:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26632 invoked by uid 89); 9 Aug 2013 18:36:02 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:35:59 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MRA000000Q8AT00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 21:35:01 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MRA000P60YC4N50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 21:35:00 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:36:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: A new strategy for internals documentation In-reply-to: <8761vevigb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> To: Tom Tromey Cc: gnu@toad.com, yao@codesourcery.com, stanshebs@earthlink.net, gdb@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83r4e2r9uh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5201781A.3000607@earthlink.net> <83k3jyunt8.fsf@gnu.org> <52031434.2080005@codesourcery.com> <83k3jwt7in.fsf@gnu.org> <201308090129.r791Tw6a016114@new.toad.com> <83txizrz91.fsf@gnu.org> <8761vevigb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: John Gilmore , yao@codesourcery.com, stanshebs@earthlink.net, > gdb@sourceware.org > Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:15:48 -0600 > > >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Eli> Once again, the main problem (and some will say it's not a problem at > Eli> all) is that the majority of GDB developers don't see any need in this > Eli> manual's existence, or in any documentation of the internals besides > Eli> what's in the comments. > > I just don't think this is true. That is my conclusion from the discussions on this matter. I can show citations, if needed. If I'm wrong, please tell what form do you want the documentation of the GDB internals to have.