From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34143-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1749 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2009 20:20:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 1732 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2009 20:20:09 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:20:04 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KHP00E004GWG400@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:19:55 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.139.199]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KHP005QS4H6ZJD0@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:19:55 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:20:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: improved thread id reporting
In-reply-to: <m363hh4kbl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: dje@google.com, gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83prfp5yfh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20090404184604.8524C1C759C@localhost> <200904041904.n34J4UXV013513@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090404192132.GA28232@caradoc.them.org> <e394668d0904051336p56704603of8c9c31742dc04e6@mail.gmail.com> <m363hh4kbl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2

> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:07:58 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
> 
> Doug> +      printf_filtered (_("[Switching from thread #%d, %s\n"),
> Doug> +		       pid_to_thread_id (previous_inferior_ptid),
> Doug> +		       target_pid_to_str (previous_inferior_ptid));
> Doug> +      printf_filtered (_("             to thread #%d, %s]\n"),
> 
> This approach to lining things up is not i18n-friendly.

Sorry, I'm probably too dense today: why not?  If you are thinking
about the number of blanks, then the translated second message can
change their amount as appropriate, no?