From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26949 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2015 09:06:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26917 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jan 2015 09:06:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout21.012.net.il Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:06:49 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NIM00300GUJNA00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:47 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NIM003EPHB6I870@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:06:42 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:09:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB BuildBot In-reply-to: <87sif25vzr.fsf@redhat.com> To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ppa5uaqj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bnm1exo6.fsf@redhat.com> <87lhkvd9u7.fsf@redhat.com> <837fwevg2b.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3um8xvu.fsf@redhat.com> <831tmmvepo.fsf@gnu.org> <87mw5a8x34.fsf@redhat.com> <83y4outyxl.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppa67fqb.fsf@redhat.com> <83vbjytv2s.fsf@gnu.org> <83twzitur9.fsf@gnu.org> <83sif2tucs.fsf@gnu.org> <87sif25vzr.fsf@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 > From: Sergio Durigan Junior > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:46:48 -0500 > > On Thursday, January 22 2015, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> On second thought, TAGS files _should_ be in the source tree, because > >> that's where they will be used. > >> > >> So how about running "make TAGS" in the source tree? Can this be > >> done in the BuildBot? > > On a second thought (from my side), I would have to run configure from > the srcdir before "make TAGS"... While I can do that, I'm trying to > avoid having too many unecessary steps in the build. > > If the "make TAGS" step proves to be too difficult to implement in the > regular build process, I will create a special builder just for it. I don't think we need to go that far. Simply adding "cd $(srcdir) &&" to the TAGS rules that don't already do that should be good enough. Alternatively, you could do just "make -C gdb TAGS". After all, we don't necessarily need to fix the entire repository, only the parts that are under our responsibility. Perhaps this is the best alternative, on balance. WDYT?