From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34144-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2659 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2009 20:20:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 2648 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2009 20:20:51 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:20:46 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KHP00M004707M00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:20:43 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.139.199]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KHP002WZ4IIGFG0@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:20:43 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:21:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: improved thread id reporting
In-reply-to: <200904060738.n367cxHa021220@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: dje@google.com, gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83ocv95ye5.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20090404184604.8524C1C759C@localhost> <200904041904.n34J4UXV013513@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090404192132.GA28232@caradoc.them.org> <e394668d0904051336p56704603of8c9c31742dc04e6@mail.gmail.com> <83skkmbic2.fsf@gnu.org> <200904060738.n367cxHa021220@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:38:59 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> CC: dje@google.com, gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> > Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 05:56:45 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> > is slightly better, as it solves issue 1).  As for 2), I personally
> > don't mind it too much.  But if we want a single line, I can suggest
> > 
> >   [Thread switch: #1 (ID 0x2aaaab6b0f30, LWP 14403) -> #2 (ID 0x40800960, LWP 14406)]
> 
> That's still longer than a single 80-column line :(

Only for very large IDs (one of the two in this example).  How
frequent is that?