From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id POJkFPvhTGD2CAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:02:03 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 462D71EF78; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:02:03 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72D181E54D for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:02:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6D83857C70; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:02:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE6D83857C70 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1615651321; bh=pqQjqCgj+nIPI/Bx9iVP07ONX+yfIhwjgyVitLLdHG0=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=iRnWz5byw4dz+e8R+r1bLBE+GZE34kDLtXAJRMypP7je+8NEEPH/yj13Ym3kEl4Hk 3881umh1WJL0gWqnc+rVJyFdfLdqHcY/DXsSUT9sGoqmDaJ4aDM7llmjU3cATtftd6 gN0/uVvrzBWCeiYSIqlML7rqGbkT99/m/oojFQVI= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4353857C70 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:01:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5C4353857C70 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL6iE-0007eO-Ps; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:01:58 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1642 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lL6iB-0003gX-Tg; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:01:58 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:02:01 +0200 Message-Id: <83lfarhwjq.fsf@gnu.org> To: Mike Frysinger In-Reply-To: (message from Mike Frysinger on Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:12:40 -0500) Subject: Re: sim: replacing ChangeLog files with online git logs References: <83ft0zjys1.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:12:40 -0500 > From: Mike Frysinger > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, andrew.burgess@embecosm.com > > On 13 Mar 2021 09:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 21:53:54 -0500 > > > From: Mike Frysinger via Gdb > > > > > > we're planning on dropping ChangeLog files in sim/ and replacing > > > them with a pointer to the online vcs log. > > > > Will the release tarballs include the generated ChangeLog file? If > > not, why not? > > we can, but we're leaning towards not because they don't seem to be > providing any actual value for people. So people who don't have Git will be left without the logs? I'm not sure I'm okay with that. Producing a ChangeLog from Git log when the release is tarred is not hard, why skip it?