From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-40896-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31535 invoked by alias); 14 May 2012 02:49:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 31524 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2012 02:49:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TW_SM
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2012 02:48:48 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M3Z00600RNP5E00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 05:48:23 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M3Z006DVRSM0R90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 14 May 2012 05:48:23 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 02:49:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [mingw]gdb CVS HEAD build error
In-reply-to: <4FB05F17.7090701@gmail.com>
To: asmwarrior <asmwarrior@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83k40fwk5k.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4FB05F17.7090701@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:25:43 +0800
> From: asmwarrior <asmwarrior@gmail.com>
> 
> It looks like those format: "%lld"
> 
> sprintf (str, "%lld", va_arg (ap, long long));
> 
> is not supported under MinGW.

Correct.

> By reading this link:
> http://cboard.cprogramming.com/cplusplus-programming/118149-long-long-int-gplusplus-mingw.html
> 
> It suggest that under MinGW, we should use %I64d
> 
> Any ideas?

Use decimal2str?