From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28959 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2009 15:58:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 28950 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Sep 2009 15:58:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:58:05 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KPI00F009BKZV00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:58:03 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.50.163]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KPI00KOD9OFKI70@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:57:52 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:58:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [gdb-7.0 release] 2009-09-02 status and proposed plan In-reply-to: <200909050812.n858CrY4005087@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> To: Mark Kettenis Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, teawater@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org, msnyder@vmware.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83hbvh4c8l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20090902164425.GR4379@adacore.com> <20090905002520.GA19729@adacore.com> <200909050812.n858CrY4005087@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:12:53 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > CC: teawater@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org, msnyder@vmware.com > > Unless people are aware of an operating system that uses negative > numbers for system calls, I don't think it matters very much whether > we use a signed or an unsigned type. If it doesn't matter, I'd prefer an unsigned type.