From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id /V4gHQq9TWA/HgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:36:42 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 66A621EF78; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:36:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FADE1E54D for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:36:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FD23851C29; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:36:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 39FD23851C29 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1615707401; bh=t6qYTSbALz/KLUX2jE1STw6yrkhSs9ZkEm54msF3fWE=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=tiuY2RE75IXRU8ROet85xbdnEMF1KN3TjKKk/7b/LPPZktrMXjTTF6dDg1En9LPRY 9c2uEBBsNlT9kdAihK3Ni0jDxEe2o4KWIKP+TOkSVeghUfytSKuWRc0ts1WhWj9HBI nzsxOG1kDsoLOx0B78VD7R0MFKoDliB+Mv4c1QuA= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F50D3851C29 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:36:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0F50D3851C29 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLIk-0007JF-7z; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:36:38 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3598 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLIj-0006tG-CY; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:36:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:36:46 +0200 Message-Id: <83h7legp9t.fsf@gnu.org> To: Andreas Schwab In-Reply-To: <87h7le42jf.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:28:36 +0100) Subject: Re: Demangling in backtraces References: <83h7loun5e.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7le42jf.fsf@linux-m68k.org> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Eli Zaretskii > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:28:36 +0100 > > > #0 0x70f5ac3e in libgccjit-0!_Z17gimple_build_callP9tree_nodejz () > > Is this prefix part of the symbol name? A valid mangled name must start > with _Z. No, that's the name of the shared library. This is a known peculiarity on Windows, see "Non-debug DLL Symbols" in the GDB manual. Are you saying that if those prefixes weren't there, GDB would have demangled the names automatically?